三、英文作文: On January 15, 2009, US Airways Flight 1549 lost both engines after a bird strike. Air traffic control suggested returning to LaGuardia or going to another airport, but Captain Sullenberger judged these options unsafe. He made the decision to land on the Hudson River, successfully saving all 155 people on board. The National Transportation Safety Board later investigated whether his choice was appropriate. Write a 250-word essay analyzing Captain Sullenberger’s leadership and judgment during this crisis. In your opinion, during emergencies, is it better to follow the established authority or rely on your own judgment? Support your view with specific examples.
申論題作答 (共 3 筆)
依時間顯示最近 3 筆。
【站僕】摩檸Morning.
申論題作答 #85919
1 分
1
總分
10秒 總時間
0 人解鎖
2026.06
作答大綱
13123213123123
正文
123123123123123
陳彥霖(中年大叔之健康最重要)
申論題作答 #85586
1 分
1
總分
15秒 總時間
0 人解鎖
2026.06
作答大綱
13123123123
正文
12312312
陳彥霖(中年大叔之健康最重要)
申論題作答 #2683
94 分
94
總分
7分51秒 總時間
0 人解鎖
2026.02
作答大綱
1. Intro: Flight 1549, Hudson River landing. 2. Analysis: Calmness, expe...
正文
The Triumph of Judgment Over Protocol: Analyzing Flight 1549 On January...