最新資料

教甄◆國小普通科專業知能

一二等船長◆航運業務

教甄◆國小美術科專業知能

115年 - 115 新北市立國民中學_教師聯合甄選試題：本土語文-客語科#140271(50題)

115年 - 115 新北市立國民中學_教師聯合甄選試題：資訊科技科#140270(40題)

115年 - 115年 51-100#140269(50題)

115年 - 115 新北市立國民中學_教師聯合甄選試題：表演藝術科#140268(50題)

115年 - 115 新北市立國民中學_教師聯合甄選試題：音樂科#140267(50題)

115年 - 115 新北市立國民中學_教師聯合甄選試題：特教身障科#140266(70題)

115年 - 115 新北市立國民中學_教師聯合甄選試題：輔導專業知能科#140265(8題)

115年 - 115 新北市立國民中學_教師聯合甄選試題：視覺藝術科#140264(50題)

115年 - 115 新北市立國民中學_教師聯合甄選試題：體育科#140263(50題)

115年 - 115 新北市立國民中學_教師聯合甄選試題：家政科#140262(50題)

10. 當船舶在航行中，發現將進入霧區，或已在霧區中，請問應立即採取何種措施？ (A)將 船速改為適當緩速 (B)派人值班瞭望 (C)每隔二分鐘發霧號一次、嗚笛或打鐘 (D)以上 皆是

9. 電器裝備在具有可燃液體、氣體中燃燒，要用不導電之滅火劑來破壞燃燒鏈，請問指 下列何者？ (A)水霧 (B)化學乾粉 (C)泡沫 (D)以上皆非

8. 請問下列何者是不能用水沖淡，與水相遇時，能飛濺四方的化學藥品？ (A)氯酸鈉 (B)鎂粉 (C)硫酸 (D)鉛粉

7. 請問在海上人命安全國際公約(SOLAS)中，對機艙之固定壓力噴水滅火系統之規定為何？

6. 請問在海上人命安全國際公約(SOLAS)中，對機艙之固定低脹力泡沫滅火系統之規定為何？

5. 試述急救的原則中，在搬運受傷人員時，頭部應該放置在擔架的什麼位置？為什麼？

王立杰-幼稚教育考試精粹

講師：【站僕】摩檸Morning.

陳萱-公民

講師：【站僕】摩檸Morning.

陳真、黃靖-行政學精典

講師：【站僕】摩檸Morning.

近代東亞史

描述：龍騰108課綱普高歷史必修第2冊L4～L6：移民史、救亡圖存史、戰爭史。年份若未提及，皆採西元紀年，感謝Kiki...

主題名稱

課程：高二下英文課程
章節：L6 Dabbawalas:Door-to-Door Meal Delivery in Mumbai

FVOCI的減損

課程：會計學(含中級會計學)
章節：金融資產

1. 下列光學顯微鏡中何者能獲得最清晰及立體的細胞結構影像？ (A)brightfield microscope(亮視野顯微鏡) (B)phase-contrast microscope(位相差顯微鏡) (C)fluorescence microscope(螢光顯微鏡) (D)confocal microscope(共軛焦顯微鏡)

3. 在細胞內膜系統中，下列何者為最常見的共同路徑？ (A)高基氏體(Golgi)→溶解體(lysosome)→內質網(ER)→細胞膜(plasma membrane) (B)核膜(nuclear envelope)→溶解體→高基氏體→細胞膜 (C)內質網→葉綠體(chloroplasts)→粒腺體(mitochondrion)→細胞膜 (D)粗糙內質網(rough ER)→液泡(vesicles)→高基氏體→細胞膜

5. 下列何者不是轉錄因子(transcription factor)的 DNA 結合區(DNA-binding domain)常見的構形(motif)？ (A)鋅指形(zinc finger) (B)六合體(hexamer) (C)白胺酸拉鍊(leucine zipper) (D)螺旋迴轉螺旋(helix-turn-helix)

43. (A) in addition to (B) as well as (C) due to (D) instead of

44. (A) originates from (B) pours into (C) fluctuates among (D) appears in

45. (A) legislators (B) instructors (C) conductors (D) manufacturers 以下是試卷內容的題目與選項： 請依下文回答第46題至第50題 Denver's public schools' three-year plunge from one of the nation's most carefully planned and promising examples of public-education transformation into a district led by a school board in disarray has multiple causes, and there's plenty of blame to spread around. Ultimately, however, it is the result of a concerted effort over more than a decade by organized and committed activists, local and national, who have opposed changing the governance and operation of school districts in any significant way. The politics of public education in Denver have grown increasingly in school systems across the country. What distinguishes the conflict over reform in Denver is how unrelated it is to student outcomes. While Denver's reforms have been far from perfect, they merit the national attention they've drawn. A growing body of evidence makes clear that outcomes for students in the city slowly yet significantly improved, including for students the district has historically failed to serve well. Yet as soon as Denver Public Schools took its initial steps toward reform less than two decades ago, an active opposition campaign arose, aimed not at moderating or improving the reforms, but at destroying them. In 2019, the election of three new anti-reform members to the Denver Board of Education flipped the board majority to that camp. Since the educational reform was launched in 2005, Denver's families and educators have embraced choice. The broad popularity of choice in Denver makes dismantling reform politically fraught for the board and its allies. In fact, the board has faced strong pushback from some parents and educators and has had to confront the complex reality of governing a district where choice, autonomy, and a focus on outcomes are now woven into the fabric of public education. But the union-supported board majority was determined to push ahead, and that meant cleaninghouse at the top. In fall 2020, Superintendent Susana Cordova resigned after less than two years on the job. Cordova is a Denver native and Denver Public Schools graduate who had spent most of her professional career working for the district. Cordova never got a chance to enact her own agenda. First, a teacher strike weakened her just weeks into her tenure. Next, the new board gave her no room to enact changes. Finally, softening the impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic became the district's sole focus. Now that the pandemic's disruption is receding, the board appears poised to renew its efforts to roll back reform. It has a good chance of succeeding, because in November 2021, all four of the anti-reform candidates won, giving their side unanimous control.